?

Log in

No account? Create an account
We can finally be ourselves
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 1 most recent journal entries recorded in Republican Safe Haven's LiveJournal:

Wednesday, January 19th, 2005
2:14 am
[brianna_aisling]
I wanted to share some articles. It's (going to be) a series that makes the case for Judeo-Christian values. There's only three parts so far, but it's definitely worth keeping your eye on.

Better Answers: The Case for Judeo-Christian Values, Part I, Part II, Part III by Dennis Prager

From Part I:
What is needed today is a rationally and morally persuasive case for embracing the values that come from the Bible. This case must be more compelling than the one made for anti-biblical values that is presented throughout the Western world's secular educational institutions and media (news media, film and television).

That is what I intend to do. Events in the news will compel columns on those events, but I do not believe that anything I can do with my life can match the importance of making the case for guiding one's life and one's society by the values of the Bible. As a Jew, by "biblical" I am referring to the Old Testament, but this should pose no problem to Christian readers, since this is the first part of their Bible as well. Indeed, as the greatest Jewish thinker, Maimonides, pointed out over 800 years ago, it is primarily Christians who have spread knowledge of the Jews' Bible to the human race.

From Part II:
A major reason for the left's loathing of George W. Bush is his use of moral language -- such as in his widely condemned description of the regimes of North Korea, Iran and Iraq as an "Axis of Evil." These people reject the central Judeo-Christian value of the existence of objective good and evil and our obligation to make such judgments. Secularism has led to moral confusion, which in turn has led to moral paralysis.

From Part III (My favorite part so far):
There are four primary problems with reason divorced from God as a guide to morality.

The first is that reason is amoral. Reason is only a tool and, therefore, can just as easily argue for evil as for good. If you want to achieve good, reason is immensely helpful; if you want to do evil, reason is immensely helpful. But reason alone cannot determine which you choose. It is sometimes rational to do what is wrong and sometimes rational to do what is right.
About LiveJournal.com